I’ve just finished reading Graham Hunter’s insightful and
interesting book “Barca; The Making of
the Greatest Team in the World” where he takes a magnifying glass to
everything at the Catalan club from the La Masia academy and the background
politics to the lives and histories of key personnel like Pep Guardiola, Xavi
Hernandez and Lionel Messi.
One of the key themes in the book is the huge impact that
Johan Cruyff had on the club, particularly in his stint as manager in the late
1980s/early 1990s. The theory goes that the current success of the club under
Guardiola’s management has its genesis in the almost complete overhaul of the
Catalan club that Cruyff instigated.
The two key facets of Cruyff’s policy were the implementation
of an offensive 4-3-3/3-4-3 formation on the first team with Guardiola in the pivote role and then ensuring that this
formation was used at every level of the club youth development system
(obligatory use of the phrase La Masia) to
ensure that the best young players would be schooled to know how to play in
their respective position and so slot seamlessly when they made the jump to the
first team. Cruyff would go on to win a record 11 trophies at the club,
including their first European Cup in 1992.
The influence on the current ‘Pep team’ is blindingly
obvious as the formation and attacking intent is very similar (with Sergio
Busquets performing the Guardiola role) and the number of cantera graduates coming through the system who, upon graduation to
the first team, slot into their respective positions with no fuss. From Xavi
and Iniesta through Messi and Busquets to the current crop of Cuenca and Tello,
the fruits of Cruyff’s labours are plain to see. Guardiola has since surpassed
Cruyff’s trophy record.
In between these two epochs was the success of Frank Rijkaard’s
teams which took the influences of the Cruyff formation in addition to the
young generation coming through (particularly Iniesta, Valdes and Messi) from La Masia. However, the Rijkaard team
failed as it’s generally seen that the team lost its hunger for success; a
lesson Guardiola is keen to avoid and has to a certain extent, though time will
tell.
In the same way that Rijkaard and Guardiola’s success can be
traced back to the seeds sown twenty years beforehand(thus creating the
‘Barcelona way’), the successful season that Reading have had can very
conceivably be seen in seeds sown by Brian McDermott’s predecessors starting
over a decade ago. And this isn’t just promotion giddiness talking, going and
comparing Reading to Barcelona.
Whilst there has been no large scale restructuring of the
club ala Cruyff, key themes and elements of this successful Reading side can be
seen in the last two times we were successful in this division, with
refinements and evolution over the years.
The play-off defeat of 2002/03 team of Alan Pardew, the
2005/06 Championship-winning squad of Steve Coppell and this season’s
incarnation under McDermott all share distinctive similarities in their
respective on-field and off-field demeanours and styles.
The playing style of each team is very similar; reliant for
creativity on wingers (from John Salako and Luke Chadwick through Glen Little
and Bobby Convey to Jobi McAnuff and Jimmy Kebe), hard-working almost to the
point of self-sufficient strikers (Nicky Forster, Kevin Doyle, Noel Hunt, Jason
Roberts) and a solid, uncompromising, ever-present base of central defence and
centre midfield to launch attacks from. If there is a ‘Reading style’ of football,
this is it and it has been it for the last ten years since Pardew was manager.
The teams of Coppell that failed to get promoted in 2003/04,
2004/05 and 2008/09 as well as being relegated n 2007/08 all played in this
manner and, despite McDermott being absolutely right in saying that he has
created three different teams in his time as Reading manager, each of them
broadly played in the same manner. Each time the system was found out, it has
been refined but the same basic premise remains.
The other key reason for the successes of Pardew, Coppell
and McDermott, and for the interspersed failures indeed, has been the utilisation
of team spirit to create a ‘greater than the sum of our parts’ playing staff.
Pardew’s style was to create something of a siege mentality, Coppell’s may well
have been something of an accident created by some players that really got on
well mixed with success (as in evidence by the capitulation of 2007/08 and the
subsequent clear loss of team spirit) whilst this season’s team looks genuinely
like they get on well and are a supremely united unit as in evidence by their
celebrations together but, more importantly, their socialising together all
through the season. We did say that about the 2005/06 vintage mind, when
finding factors to attribute their initial Premier League success to.
Lessons from the 2005/06 team to the current generation,
both in terms of positives built upon and negatives learned from, can also be
seen in a similar fashion to how Guardiola has learnt from Rijkaard.
The way McDermott handled the media this season by playing
things down and the fallback line of “we’re just concentrating on the next game”
is a carbon copy of how Coppell spoke to the press and TV throughout the 106
points season. Meanwhile, the decline of that team and the way the team spirit
fell apart is something McDermott will seek to avoid when recruiting players this
summer.
The fact that McDermott has been around the club for so long
and picked up the best bits of each of his predecessors can be seen as
instrumental to this year’s success, in addition to Nicky Hammond’s years of
service to maintain stability and preserve an identity on the playing side of
the club.
Sir John Madejski in his role as Chairman has a very
powerful say in the direction that the club will follow and his role in this
evolution should not be underplayed either. His choices of manager and his
desire to run the club on a budget have had a large impact on how the three
teams analysed were made and developed. But additionally, his desire to not be
an overbearing Chairman has allowed the distinctive Reading manner outlined
earlier to flower by giving managers the time and space to refine the system
that had become stale under their predecessors. *It should be hoped that Anton
Zingarevich will continue this and quotes like these
give a good indication that he will.
Overall, this post isn’t about comparing Reading to
Barcelona as every club enjoying success for an extended period of time (which
Reading have relatively over the last ten years) can trace that success back
through its ‘family tree’ to see where its roots lay and the evolution that the
club has been on in that time by building on past successes and learning from
failures in a stable environment.
The success of this season can be traced back through
Coppell and Pardew’s team building, their style of play and their own personalities’,
combined with the understated role of Hammond as a pillar of the club, all under
the influence of Madejski’s stable ownership regime.
To say that this season has been the culmination of a
decade-long project is wrong but the DNA this team possess has traces of Coppell,
Pardew, Hammond and Madejski in it and whilst the success is hugely
attributable to McDermott, his coaching staff and the playing staff, how they
all got there and the way in which their success has been achieved has its
roots a lot further back than the start of the season.
*Incidentally, the one manager who wasn’t given the time,
Brendan Rodgers, was the one manager who seemed to attempt to branch out from
the successful model of the last decade in his style of football and Madejski
appeared to notice the mistake swiftly and rectify it.
No comments:
Post a Comment