You know what the UK television market needs? More current affairs comedy/satire programmes. I mean, there is probably only about five of them currently running at the moment across the main channels, each with their own gimmick and so on. Clearly, it's a formula that works, else there wouldn't be so many of them. But wait, what's this? A live variety? Featuring an all star line up of contemporary leftist comedic stars? And Lauren Laverne? Well, let's see.
Everyone knows that UK TV has been looking for a home grown equivalent of America's Daily Show and this is probably as close as we are going to get to it as the BBC would never be able to get away with a show like this due to impartiality rules and ITV is, well just a bit shit and it would inevitably be hosted by Adrian Chiles so would be worse than shit; something even Fiver wouldn't show.
Basically, the show's premise is like a combination of Question Time, Newsnight, Screenwipe/Newswipe and Andrew Marr's Sunday morning show but whilst at the same time trying to attract a younger demographic. Biiiiiiigggggg challenge.
Firstly, if it wants to be respected as a forum for real political debate, a balance has to be struck between being funny but also letting the experts do their thing, something David Mitchell and Jimmy Carr both struggled with at times. That said, the five guests all contributed and were allowed to articulate their points whilst Mitchell emerged as a very sharp interviewer.
Elsewhere, Charlie Brooker doing what he does, cynicism in nicely put together edited pieces but tends to struggle with live TV, perhaps because he is a far better writer as a comedian than a quick wit like Carr and Mitchell. Although his piece on Tunisia, similar in nature to his edited pieces familiar to viewers of Newswipe, was glorious rant on the Western media full of perfectly formed points and humour.
Carr, acting pretty much as the front man of the group delivered his one liners with customary aplomb but perhaps lacks the real interest in current affairs that Mitchell and Brooker, aside from making the odd layman's point in debates. Should not be allowed to interview people either due to his laughing at most left-field points which leads me on to.
Lauren Laverne doing not an awful lot it must be said which seems a bit of a waste of talent as she is a good broadcaster and occasionally comes out with some good lines. Perhaps could be given Carr's slot for interviews to both get some use out of her.
Mitchell showed a surprising turn as leader and director of a debate but also in his usual high quality rant mode for people who are familiar with his soapbox videos on the Internet. He is perhaps the most multi-talented person working on television today; comedic actor, writer, comedic performer, panellist and burgeoning interviewer, albeit one that is learning.
Certainly, there is some dire pieces such as the World News Now feature and the Holiday Hotspot piece which were very forced and rather lazy but these were offset elsewhere by some lively debate that was insightful, intelligent and reasoned. The show can be a bit slow at times but that's live TV for you I guess, it comes with the territory of strange cuts to cameras pointing at people's feet and stuttering from the hosts
There was a definite lack of impartiality but what's funny about the centre ground in politics? You can only make laughs from a perspective, there is not much funny about beige, neutrality and generally being in the middle, just ask the Swiss.
All in all, a promising start that can improve in time but the last show I said that about was The Event and look how that went
No comments:
Post a Comment